Skip to the content

Kansas State University

  1. K-State home >
  2. College of Veterinary Medicine >
  3. Continuing Education >
  4. Archives >
  5. 2003
  6. Merck-Merial Veterinary Scholars Symposium

4th Annual Merck-Merial Veterinary Scholars Symposium

July 31 - August 2, 2003

 

Summary of Breakout Group Activity:

Group A: Student Suggestions for Promoting a Scientific Research Culture….

1) Providing research requirements or research electives within the veterinary curriculum
2) Encourage faculty to provide summer research employment opportunities beyond basic "grunt work"
3) Increase clinically relevant research opportunities. Promote focus groups between clinical veterinarians and researchers to improve communication.
4) Instructors bring their personal research interests to curriculum (ex: 1 credit hour class where researchers describe their work to students)
5) Continue to push NIH research stipends to levels competitive with private practice salaries (continue to push dept-relief for research veterinarians)
6) Select enthusiastic peer speakers to promote continuing education and share positive research experiences
7) Have student groups sponsor speakers in research- using format similar to "pet food company lunch seminars"
8) Improve relationship between research community and lockal clinicians- try to get local community clinicians engaged in research process with opportunity for feedback

 
Group B: Perceptions about Research Funding….

Public University less $ than Private
  Less $$ support for research
  Poorer staff #'s
"Hot Topics" get more $$ (ex: bioterrorism)
  to the detriment of other research areas (get overshadowed/underfunded)
Dual degree programs underfunded (relative to MD/PhD)
  Want tuition remission and stipend support for duration of DVM/PhD program
Grant Writing
  Frustrating
  Requires initiative and creativity
  Money is there
  Competition maintains quality of research
Funding lets you "do what you love"
Academic research = flexibility

 
Group C: Student Perceptions about the Advantages of a Research Career….
1) Good hours
2) Good pay
3) PhD = increased opportunities
4) Can generate new knowledge
5) Collaborate with people outside of veterinary medicine
6) Become a world expert in a specific area
7) Chance to help a lot of animals (> impact than private practice)
8) Get position in academic setting (intellectually rich and fun)
9) Be a member of a team- learn from people in many disciplines
10) Opportunity to travel
11) More flexibility in career over lifetime
12) Opportunity to stay current in veterinary medicine (access to cutting edge info)
13) Greater understanding of treatment
14) Opportunity to influence policy, government spending and the direction of research
15) Less stress? – in terms of emotional bonds, client/patient relationships

 
Group D: Student Perceptions about the Disadvantages of a Research Career…
1) Need/pressure to obtain consistent funding
2) Competition
3) Time commitment
4) Requires a lot of patience
5) Limited exposure to animals
6) Politics involved
7) Highly specialized
8) High level of paperwork
9) Must write a lot of papers
10) Tedious
11) Geographically limited
12) Technological issues
13) Animal rights groups/ethics- perceptions of others and personal issues
14) Must tailor your work to meet others’ objectives
15) Study limititations
16) Regulatory Issues

 
Group E: Student Concerns about Work-Life Balance…

1) Combined Career with Spouse:
  Competing for success
Less flexibility when there are two
Time for social life
Time for Family and children
2) Regrets for Choices Made?
  Children/No Children
Children- when?
Single/Married
Lost Opportunities
3) Job Discrimination based on gender?
  The child-bearing years- discrimination in private practice vs. industry vs. CVM
4) Generational or Gender Issues?
  Two incomes the norm
Women/Men (wife/husband) share more tasks
Guilt over leaving the children when maternity (parental) leave ends
5) Childcare Options:
  Nanny/Au pair
Daycare
Self
Extended Family
Spouse
6) "Series of Trade-offs"
7) "Things work themselves out"
8) "Family should always come first"

 
Group F: Faculty Coordinators thoughts on Improving the Summer Programs…

1) Enhancing the Website:
  More links to grad sites, job info, picture gallery
Guestbook to promote interaction
Maintain symposium links for on-line evaluation, picture gallery
2) NIH T35s: Blending the programs to everyone’s advantage- expanding symposium
3) Moving up the Application Time Table to help programs and students commit
4) Expanding the Symposium:
  Diversify funding to increase summer scholar attendance
Open to combined DVM/PhD students
Open to undergraduates doing research in comparative medicine at CVMs
5) Improving the ways we track alumni of the Merck-Merial and T35 summer programs
6) Add Graduate Program Fair to symposium (from a student)

 
Group G: Undergraduate Research Experience…..
What works:

1) Communication-
  i. with Mentor/Supervisor
ii. knowledge of the other projects in the lab
iii. regularly scheduled meetings or bulletin board
2) Confidence to give certain level of independence
3) Providing background (big picture) of research project

What doesn't work:
1) Lack of trust/Underestimation of Intelligence
2) Absence of organized, realistic timelines
3) Lack of consistent mentor availability
4) Lack of patience
5) Unclear expectations